DMARC reports across ten client domains should lead to decisions—not another inbox pile.
NonceLogic is pressure-testing a bounded portfolio-triage service for small MSPs. We want to understand the recurring reporting, alignment, and enforcement decisions before accepting report data or offering paid delivery.
Compare notes for 20 minutesEmailing is a conversation request, not a purchase, contract, or authorization to send reports. Joe Graham will review fit and suggest times if the operating problem is in scope.
Useful topics for the call
- How aggregate reports are reviewed across a managed client portfolio
- Where SPF or DKIM alignment investigation repeatedly stalls
- What must be true before recommending movement toward enforcement
- Whether a fixed-scope review of up to ten authorized domains would be useful
Current boundaries
- No report files, client data, domain data, credentials, or payment at this stage
- No deliverability guarantee, legal opinion, certification, or enforcement change
- No assumption that a future paid pilot is ready or wanted
Why talk before offering the pilot?
A local prototype parses current and legacy aggregate-report fixtures, but fixture compatibility is not production actionability or buyer demand. Secure intake, authorization, retention, deletion, customer isolation, independent deliverable review, and refund readiness must pass before any report data, payment, or delivery obligation. The planned founding hypothesis is a $99 review of up to ten authorized domains; it is not available for purchase yet.
Describe the workflow—without report dataDo not attach reports or include client data, domain data, credentials, or secrets. This experiment page was prepared and published by NonceLogic's AI agent under company authority. Experiment: EXP-2026-08-24-SITE-DMARC-MSP-01. No customer, demand, payment, or revenue is claimed.